Explanation on the Evolution of the Federal Indian Policy from Washington through Jackson’s Administration Essay

President Lincoln in his Gettysburg address told the solid ground that the state promotes a government of the mountain for the people and by the people. In Jacksons time he stressed out what Thomas Jefferson believes that self-sufficient society is making dependent people independent (studyworld 1998). Both have spoken of people and a nation. Being once the heads of this super powerful nation, the yoke of responsibility on governing whose people and what nation is on their shoulders. It is a matter of whose depart atomic number 18 being protected when what is put in question are the rights and obligations between the natives and the whites.For the rich and influential will sovereignty rule? During the Jackson administration it wasnt so. Authority at that time must eliminate exclusively the risk to carry on a business plan. We can never measure the enormous weights between love for ones country and the evil of greed but history repeats itself and is always a witnesser to the fa ll and rise of many cities and countrys. The past Jackson administration has its goals or measure to take. However, democracy is meant to give each one according to its due.As for now, America is a dream of many race, a mixture of culture and hopefully will always be the land of plenty and opportunities. It is so because it was the yield of its enormous labor, tears and pain and good leader beam of some honorable statesmen but more so of its people. Much to be said but domain stands where humans are treated reverently. Many great leaders had fathomed this thought. Many so called good leaders have thrown out the weakest from the sinking ship in order to save a chosen few or the meanest.Jackson at first diplomatically covered the Cherokees land until pushing them to manuscript as narrated in the book the Trails of Tears. He injected in these so called savages that they can not just be hunters but too agriculturists ( inborn Indians are inborn hunters and by nature obedient but str ong people in body and character). They asked the native inhabitants to transfer from one state to plant cottons but in reality the Native Americans do not dig to cultivate because during their times food is in abundance.On the other hand, that present administration intends to dig for gold and by all means will strive hard to become a super power that is known today. Despite the ruling of the Supreme Court on sovereignty, the Indians left wing their ancestral lands led by Chief Ross who at that time can only if do the least he can do best when only destiny could dictate the future. Civilizations like industrialization or advancement are always paid for at a great price. Georgias bowel movement to dislodge the Cherokees is more about oppressing than helping its inhabitants.It was merely a struggle of the fittest where the strongest always envelopes the weakest. Reformers of the past could have set their goals on advancement without due watch over to Indians tribal customs and tr aditions. The present Indian law and nonetheless about five tribes is complex as we view the state government with the history of federal official Indian policy. Though they are just minority compared to the whole U. S. population, they maintain their sovereignty and are subject to their individual tribal government while also being subjected to the federal state government.Reformers or oppressors whatever the name could be, when a trail is lost it is impossible to go back where one belongs. Native cultures are dismissal because the new school taught that their parents and grand parents learning are inferior to what is new (Montana 1993). After a century, efforts on behalf of the present government to regain the loss culture among the Native Americans is being acted upon, laws concerning sovereignty (House 2007) is upheld but only to few remaining 1. 7 Million Indians since most of them had already faded away in concert with their homelands.Referencehttp//www.house.leg.state.mn.us/ hrd/pubs/indiangb.pdf