Kant Vs Mill on the Issue of Lying Essay -- Philosophy, Ethics

Firstly, by looking at the first affected role, whether she gets a kidney from her stimulate or a cadaver kidney , there bequeath be no difference because she needs a kidney nonetheless. The second patient however, suffernot agree to nurse his kidney away because one of the main reasons is that hes sc ard and lacks the endurance to make this donation9. So right at this point, it can be seen that it would be better if the father didnt give his kidney away because it wouldnt cause him any happiness, whereas the daughter has two options to gIn everyday life, whether on a personal base or on a schoolmaster base, difficult scenarios, or also known as moral dilemmas, are present. Depending on whom the person is or what their belief and value systems are, the issue can be resolved. In this particular fount, questions arise about whether it is virtuously right to lie to family members when something can be done, ignoring the fact of its after effects. The case will be explained in de tails later on including the patients state, but to answer this ethical question, two theorists will be presented for the con and pro side. For the con side, the deontologist Immanuel Kant will be presented with his theory that double-dealing is prohibited under all circumstances, as for the pro side, John Stuart grind will be presented for the utilitarian theory stating that whichever decision brings out the or so happiness is the right decision. After discussing the case, my personal view of what is right will be stated with my own reasons, which is that lying is the right decision to be taken. This case study which is taken from Robert M. Veatchs Medical Ethics support is about a 5 year old girl, who from the last 3 years, has been suffering from progressive renal failure which... ...nication for no one would be saying the truth. et a donor kidney. BooksHill, Thomas E., Categorical and Hypothetical Imperatives. In The Blackwell guide to Kants ethics. Chichester, U.K. Wi ley-Blackwell, 2009. 5-9. Rachels, James, and Stuart Rachels. 7,8,9,10. In The elements of moral philosophy. 6th ed. New York McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2010. 97-145. Veatch, Robert M.,The normative Principles of Medical Ethics. In Medical ethics. 1997. Reprint, Boston, MA Jones and Bartlett, 1989 29-56. Websitesconsequentialist. Dictionary.com. Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House, Inc. http//dictionary.reference.com/browse/consequentialist (accessed declination 05, 2011).Mill, John Stuart. Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill. Utilitarianism past, present and future. http//www.utilitarianism.com/mill2.htm (accessed December 05, 2011).